Tuesday, 20 December 2016

GLOBAL WARMING

GLOBAL WARMING
Global climatic change due to increasing atmospheric concentrations
of so-called ‘greenhouse gases’ (notably carbon dioxide and chlorofluorocarbons
or CFCs) has dominated the environmental agenda
since the mid-1980s and has engendered considerable international
political debate. There is little doubt that over the past century human
action has significantly increased the atmospheric concentration of
several gases that are closely related to global temperature. These
increased concentrations, which are set to continue to rise in the near
future, are already affecting global climate, but our poor knowledge
and understanding of the workings of the global heat balance make the
present and future situation uncertain.
Global warming is closely connected with the impact of rises in
greenhouse gases on the thin layer of ozone present in the stratosphere
above the earth. Ozone absorbs incoming ultraviolet radiation from
the sun, thus preventing the earth from overheating. In 1985 scientists
discovered what soon became identified as a hole in the ozone layer
over the Antarctic. Today, the hole is no longer confined to the Southern
Hemisphere, since stratospheric ozone depletion has now been
identified in the Northern Hemisphere and in the Arctic. Despite
prompt international action to reduce chlorofluorocarbons, past emissions
will continue to cause ozone depletion for decades to come
because of the time lag between their production and release into the
atmosphere and their damaging effects. Full recovery is not expected
until about 2050 at the earliest. Meanwhile the increase in ultraviolet
radiation reaching the earth’s surface is compounded by the fact that
greenhouse gases are transparent to incoming short-wave solar radiation
even though they absorb re-radiated long-wave radiation from
the earth’s surface. Hence the term ‘greenhouse’.
The theory relating increased atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases and global warming is strongly supported by evidence
showing that changes in the atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases have fluctuated in close harmony with global temperature
changes, indicating that the two are related. There is alsoevidence to suggest that the twentieth century is the warmest of the
second millennium. Overall, the planet has warmed at the surface by
about 0.6C over the past century. In part, this reflects the operation of
an enhanced greenhouse effect due to human pollution of the
atmosphere.
It is important to note that the warming trend over the past century
has not been continuous through either time or space. Two periods of
relatively rapid warming (from the 1910s to the 1940s and again from
the mid-1970s to the present) contrast with preceding periods which
were respectively characterised by fairly unchanging (1860s to 1900s)
and slightly declining (1940s to 1970s) temperature. Spatially, too,
global warming has been discontinuous: the two hemispheres have not
warmed and cooled in unison; moreover highly industrialised areas
appear to be warming at a slower rate than less industrialised regions.
The formidable economic, social, and political challenges posed to
the world’s governments and other policymakers by impending global
climatic change are unprecedented. Policy responses can be categorised
broadly into those that aim to prevent change, and those that
accept the changes and focus upon adapting to them. While the issue is
a truly global one, since all greenhouse gas emissions affect climate
regardless of their origin, the costs and benefits of measures to mitigate
the effects of global warming are likely to spread unevenly across countries.
The issue raises important questions of international equity since,
at present, the major proportion of greenhouse gas emissions comes
from the industrialised countries, which contain only about one quarter
of the world’s population. Third World states have called for
reductions in emissions from the industrialised countries to make more
of the planet’s capacity for assimilation of greenhouse gases available to
those countries that are industrialising now, a plan which should be
facilitated by transfers of finance and technology from the North to the
South.
Most countries have accepted the need to make some effort to
prevent global warming, or at least to slow its pace, by reducing greenhouse
gas emissions. A contribution has been made in this respect by
the Montreal Protocol, which was signed in 1987 and amended in
1990. Governments have committed themselves to reduce consumption
and production of substances that deplete the stratospheric ozone
layer, many of which also contribute directly to global warming. CFCs
were due to be phased out by the year 2000. Most attention since then
has been focused on carbon dioxide. In 1992, more than 150 states
participated in the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (the Earth Summit). They agreed to reduce emissionsto earlier levels, in many cases the voluntary goal being a reduction of
carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels.
An attempt to make agreed reductions legally binding was made in
1997 at the Kyoto Protocol, a follow-on to the original climate treaty,
although the United States has now withdrawn from the Kyoto
agreement. Kyoto also focused on a wider range of greenhouse gas
emissions such as methane and nitrous oxide. The declared aim of the
Protocol is to cut the combined emissions of greenhouse gases by
about 5 per cent from their 1990 levels by 2008–12, specifying the
amount each industrialised country must contribute towards this overall
aim. Those countries with the highest carbon dioxide emissions,
including the United States, Japan, the European Union, and most
other European states, are expected to reduce their emissions by 6 to 8
per cent. In practice, individual country reductions can be greater or
less than those agreed, since the Kyoto Protocol also officially sanctioned
the idea of emissions trading between industrialised countries.
Hence, if a state’s emissions fall below its treaty limit, it can sell credit
for its remaining allotment to another country to help the buyer meet
its treaty obligation.
Realistically, however, no government is likely to sacrifice significant
economic growth for reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, so
that long-term strategies to reduce emissions must uncouple economic
growth from increasing fossil fuel consumption. Reducing the amount
of energy used per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) will be one
element in such a strategy, but there is also a need for a significant shift
away from fossil fuels to more renewable energy resources. Many
industrialised countries do have experience of economic growth with
declines in energy consumption. It occurred during the late 1970s and
early 1980s, sparked by the 1970s oil crisis. Unfortunately, virtually all
governments have reinstated their faith in the belief that economic
growth must be based on an increase in energy consumption. But
the lessons of global warming make it clear that this kind of industrialisation,
based on an inefficient use of fossil fuel resources, is not a
sustainable form of development.







No comments:

Post a Comment