* The Nizam state of Hyderabad had
become part of the Indian Union following the Police Action by the
Government of India during September 13-18, 1948.
*The state of Hyderabad was kept under the rule of a military governor till the end of 1949.
*In January, 1950 a senior administrator M.A.Vellodi, ICS, was made the Chief Minister and the
Nizam was given the status of Rajpramukh.
After general elections of 1952, the first popular
ministry, headed by Burgula Ramakrishna Rao, took charge of the
state.
The state of Hyderabad,
during 1952-56, consisted of the primarily Telugu-speaking districts
of Mahabubnagar, Nalgonda, Warangal, Karimnagar,
Adilabad, Nizamabad, Khammam, Medak and the city of Hyderabad (including Ranga
Reddy district), the predominantly Marathi-speaking northern districts of
Aurangabad, Bir,Pharbani, Osmanabad and Nanded and the Kannada-speaking
southern districts of Gulbarga, Raichur and Bidar.
The Telugu-speaking districts together formed more than 50% of the area of Hyderabad state.
Notwithstanding the same, Hyderabad, during Nizam‟s rule, was the only native
state where the language of administration
was neither English, nor that of the people of the state. The language of the
courts, the administration and instruction in educational institutions was
primarily Urdu.
After the
formation of Andhra state in October, 1953, the demand for creation of other linguistic states gained
momentum.
On December 22, 1953, the then Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru,
announced in the Lok Sabha the decision to set up a States Reorganization Commission to
examine “objectively and
dispassionately” the whole question of the reorganization of the states of the Indian Union. Accordingly, the Government of
India, vide Ministry of Home Affairs
resolution, dated December 29, 1953, appointed the “States Reorganization Commission” headed by Justice S. Fazal Ali
with H.N. Kunzru and K.M. Panikkar as
members, to examine and suggest a rational solution for the reorganization of states, based on
language.
The Commission submitted its report to the Government of India in 1955.
“The Commission, after consultations and
interactions with various groups of people, is reported to have found the
public will in favour of linguistic reorganization. The
rationale was that language being the
most faithful reflection of the culture of an ethnic group, ethno-lingual boundaries would be considered the most stable
and suitable arrangement for the
effective working of democratic entities and institutions. It was alsoIt was
also perceived that the same would also
have the advantage of ease for people‟s interaction with the government.”
No comments:
Post a Comment